(Batasan
Kajian (Bab 1))
Jadi kita sambung dalam bab 1, kita ada 1.7 iaitu batasan kajian. Yang ini juga pelajar selalu buat silap ataupun dia terlupa nak letak. Jadi biasanya, kalau saya cadangkan dalam penulisan batasan kajian, mulanya awak boleh buat dalam bentuk jadual. Okay dalam bentuk jadual. Jadi ini batasan dia. Yang ini justifikasi. Batasan kajian ini ialah kita nak menyatakan apa justifikasi. Kenapa kita pilih sampel itu? Kenapa kita pilih instrumen itu? Kenapa kita buat soal selidik? Jadi kita kena letak. Contohnya kita letak batasan 20 pelajar. 20 pelajar SK Serdang. Contoh dia. Okay. Jadi beri justifikasi. Kenapa awak pilih 20 pelajar ini. Okay. 20 pelajar tadi awak pilih pula 9 tahun. Okay. Kenapa awak pilih? Kenapa awak pilih pelajar 20 pelajar daripada SK Serdang? Jadi kalau jumlah dia, kenapa 20? Kenapa tak 30? Kenapa tak 21? Kenapa tak 19? Beri justifikasi. Kemudian, kenapa SK Serdang? Kalau SK Serdang awak nak letak yang kedua boleh. Kenapa SK Serdang? Jadi nyatakan. Kenapa tak sekolah dekat Perlis? Kenapa bukan sekolah dekat Terengganu. Jadi awak kena beri justifikasi kenapa sekolah ini. Kemudian ada lagi. Kenapa. Apa pemilihan awak punya. Biasanya batasan kajian awak ni daripada awak ambil daripada metodologi. Okay. Daripada metodologi tentang dia punya sampel ataupun dia punya responden. Lokasi kajian ataupun awak pakai buku. Buku teks bahasa Melayu tingkatan 5. Kenapa? Kenapa pilih itu? Beri justifikasi. Okay. Dalam justifikasi ini awak boleh letak ayat awak justifikasi. Kemudian letaklah misalnya awak ada rujukan yang si Normaliza Abd Rahim, 2019 mengatakan bahawa ini ini ini. Dia katakan bahawa memang boleh 20 pelajar. Ini contoh ya. Jadi awak letak justifikasi. Kenapa pemilihan SK Serdang menurut Menteri Pendidikan contohnya SK Serdang merupakan sekolah luar bandar yang sekian sekian sekian. Jadi itu awak letak. Tapi ini ringkas ya dalam justifikasi kerana ini jadual. Jadual berapa. Ini apa nama justifikasi. Kemudian awak huraikan pula, sekarang ini. Ini dah tulis dalam bentuk jadual. Ini ambil daripada metodologi apa dia. Kalau awak kata awak pakai temu bual. Temu bual secara ini. Kenapa justifikasi itu. Dia benda-benda ini perlu ada justifikasi. Kadang-kadang ada orang tak letak sebab dah memang tahu buat temu bual apa semua. Tak perlu letak. Ini yang penting ialah siapa sampel dia, kenapa umur 9 tahun? Kenapa lokasi itu dekat situ? Kenapa tak buat dekat negeri lain? Kenapa tak buat dekat Korea? Contoh dia. Jadi kena ada justifikasi dia. Kemudian bila sini, jadual berapa di atas. Okay. Awak buat huraian. Huraian huraian. Huraikan satu-satu beserta dengan ulang ayat ini dengan ayat panjang. Beri justifikasi kenapa pemilihan 20 pelajar? Kenapa SK Serdang? Jadi hurai dengan lebih jelas lagi. Dengan lebih panjang lebar lagi. Supaya tidak ada persoalan daripada pemeriksa. Katakan nanti bila dia tengok analisis data ataupun bab 3, 20. Awak tak kata pun dalam batasan kajian awak pilih 20. Boleh ke 20? Mulalah. Sebenarnya cerita pasal pelajar saja. Soalan yang ditanya oleh pemeriksa adalah 20 soalan tentang pelajar saja. Memang masa itu terkedu tak boleh nak jawab soalan. Jadi bila dah ada sini, pemeriksa baca balik, tengok balik jadual. “Oh saya faham, kenapa dia buat begini”. Dah ada justifikasi ini. Contohnya kenapa. Ni ada. Novel bertajuk novel Salina. Kenapa novel Salina. Kenapa tak novel yang ada beratus, berapa ribu kat pasaran dekat DBP. Jadi awak boleh justifikasi kenapa novel Salina ini kerana memenangi. Ini contoh ya. Memenangi anugerah bla bla. Ataupun menjadi buku teks tingkatan 5 pada tahun sekian sekian. Jadi awak letaklah justifikasi itu kerana apa. Dan pastikan justifikasi yang awak letak berdasarkan batasan ini memang justifikasi yang menyerlah. Sebab contohnya, ada pelajar dia buat tentang majalah. Majalah A contoh dia. Lepastu saya tanya. Saya tanya kenapa awak pilih majalah A. Kemudian pelajar jawab dalam justifikasi saya dah tulis bahawa majalan A telah memenangi sekian sekian sekian pada tahun sekian sekian. Bolehlah. Bolehlah kita ambil sebagai itu. Contohnya yang lain tentang cerpen. Cerpen yang diambil pada tahun 2000. Contoh 2015 hingga ini. Cerpen itu ambil daripada majalah sekian sekian sekian. Jadi mungkinlah justifikasi dia mungkin ialah dia memenangi anugerah juga. Jadi bolehlah dia ambil situ. Justifikasi ini mesti perkara yang penting yang menyebabkan kenapa awak memilih. Pilih bahan itu. Kenapa awak pilih sampel itu? Kenapa umur ini? Jadi semua itu perlu ada justifikasi dalam bentuk jadual. Kemudian buat huraian di bawah ini. Supaya ia lebih jelas. Bila lebih jelas, ia memang tidak ada persoalan daripada pemeriksa. Dan juga dalam ini jangan lupa kita kena ada penanda wacana. Supaya kita nampak sebagai penulisan akademik. Itu amat penting ya. Jangan lupa tentang batasan kajian.
Terjemahan:
So we continue in chapter 1, we have 1.7 which is the limitation
of the study. In this part also a student who always makes mistakes or he
forgets to put it. So usually, if I suggest in writing the limitations of the
study, at first you can do it in tabular form. So this is her limitation. This
is justification. The limitation of this study is that we want to state what
the justification is. Why did we choose that sample? Why did we choose that
instrument? Why do we do questionnaires? So we have to put it down. For
example, we place a limit of 20 students. 20 students of SK Serdang. We have to
justify. Why did you choose these 20 student. The 20 students you chose were 9
years old. Why did you choose? Why did you choose 20 students from SK Serdang?
So if he counts, why 20? Why not 30? Why not 21? Why not 19? Justify. Then, why
SK Serdang? If SK Serdang you want to put the second you can. Why SK Serdang?
So state. Why not go to school near Perlis? Why not a school near Terengganu.
So you have to justify why this school. Then there is more. What choice do you
have. Usually the limitations of your study are more than you take from the
methodology. Okay. From the methodology about him having a sample or he has a
respondent. Study location or you use a book. Textbooks Malay levels 5. Why?
Why choose that? Justify. In this justification you can put your sentence
justification. Then put for example you have a reference that Normaliza Abd
Rahim, 2019 says that this is this. He said that it is possible for 20 students.
Here is an example. So you have a justification. Why the election of SK Serdang
according to the Minister of Education for example SK Serdang is a rural school
that is so many. So that's where you are. But this is simple yes in
justification because this is the schedule. How many tables. This is what the
name of the justification is. Then you explain it, right now. This is written
in tabular form. This takes from what methodology is. If you say you use an
interview. Interview in this way. Why that justification. He these things need
justification. Sometimes there are people who do not put it because they
already know how to interview everyone. No need to place. The important thing
is who sampled him, why is he 9 years old? Why is the location so close? Why not
make it near another country? Why not make it near Korea? An example of it. So
there must be a justification for him. Then when here, how much table above.
Okay. You make a description. Description description. Explain one by one along
with repeating this sentence with a long sentence. Justify why the selection of
20 students? Why SK Serdang? So explain more clearly. With even longer width.
So that there is no question from the examiner. Tell me later when he looks at
the data analysis or chapters 3, 20. You did not even say in the limitation of
the study you chose 20. Can it be 20? Get started. Actually, the story is about
students only. The questions asked by the examiner are 20 questions about
students only. Indeed, at that time he was stunned and could not answer the
question. So when you are here, the examiner reads back, looks back at the
schedule. "Oh I understand, why did he do this". There is already
this justification. For example why. There is no. The novel is titled Salina
novel. Why Salina's novel. Why not have hundreds of novels, how many thousands
in the market near DBP. So you can justify why this Salina novel is for
winning. Here is an example. Winning the blah blah award. Or become a form 5
textbook in so many years. So you put that justification for what. And make
sure the justification you place based on this limitation is indeed a clear
justification. Because for example, there are students he made about magazines.
Magazine, for example. Then I asked. I asked why you chose magazine A. Then the
student answered in my justification I wrote that magazine A had won so many
years over the years. Not bad. Let's take it as it is. Another example is a
short story. Short stories taken in 2000. Examples of 2015 to date. The short
story is taken from so many magazines. So maybe his justification might be that
he won the award as well. So let him take it. This justification must be the
important thing that causes you to choose. Select the material. Why did you
choose that sample? Why this age? So all that needs to be justified in the form
of a schedule. Then create a description below. So that it is clearer. When it
is clearer, it is indeed no question from the examiner. And also in this do not
forget we have to have discourse markers. So that we see it as academic
writing. That is very important. Do not forget about the limitations of the
study.
RUJUKAN
Normaliza Abd Rahim (2019). Jom Tulis Tesis.
Selangor: Universiti Putra Malaysia.
Pautan Video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oywLQj4vNXM
BUKTI DAH SUBSCRIBE YOUTUBE CHANNEL PROF <3
Comments
Post a Comment